The 5th PROFEEDBACK Conference, held at the National University of Political Studies and Public Administration in Bucharest, has concluded with resounding success. The two-day event, themed “Good Practices and Lessons Learned in Social Policy Evaluation,” attracted a diverse group of international academics, professionals, policymakers, and policy evaluators. The conference is pivotal in fostering dialogue and sharing insights on social policy evaluation, aiming to improve the efficacy of social policies globally.
Day One: Panels and Abstract Presentations
The conference commenced with a series of panel discussions and abstract presentations, where participants showcased their research and practical experiences. The day provided a platform for exploring a broad spectrum of topics including social inclusion for underprivileged children, access to essential public services, poverty reduction strategies, social protection measures, safeguarding socio economic rights, promoting social cohesion, and encouraging diverse demographic participation in public life. The exchange of ideas during these sessions was marked by discussions and critical reflections, underscoring the complexity and interconnectedness of social policy issues.
Day Two: Productive Working Group Meetings
The PROFEEDBACK COST Action working group meetings took place on the 17th of May. The meetings are an important element of the Action, as they are an opportunity for PROFEEDBACK Action members to discuss professional issues related to their own methodological field.
How to join? To participate as a Working Group member, please register at e-COST and apply here. Your application will be assessed by the Core Group and the Action Chair.
These are the topics the groups are tackling throughout their work. Working Group 1: Theoretical concept of policy evaluation, designing an excellent evaluation and properly selecting between the potential methodologies is something the group member understands. The second working group concentrates the quantitative aspect of evaluation. Working Group 2: Quantitative methods and data collection, the group deals with various methodological dilemmas that arise on the use of data and the limitation of data availability. The next working group focuses on qualitative methods. Working Group 3: Qualitative and participatory methods, the applicability with regard to stakeholder involvement, providing results in an understandable way to the general public.
If you are interested in any of these topics register here!
The organizers extend gratitude to all participants and speakers for their contributions, which greatly enriched the conference. The collaboration and evidence-based dialogue at the event has set a strong foundation for future advancements in social policy evaluation.
Stay tuned for announcements about upcoming events and initiatives!